COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY OF 2–3 DEGREE COXARTHRSIS AND THE COMBINATION OF THE NEURAC AND MULLIGAN METHODS

Authors

  • I. L. Hryshyn
  • Yu. V. Antonova-Rafi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2023.17.7

Keywords:

stage 2–3 coxarthrosis, therapeutic exercises, joints, physical therapy, traditional methods of physical therapy.

Abstract

Objective. The research aims to identify the most effective approaches and recommendations for applying aspects of traditional physical therapy programs in the treatment of stage 2–3 coxarthrosis, using the Neuhrach and Mulligan techniques, as well as their combination. Materials and methods. The study was conducted based on the analysis of scientific works [1–34] and informative sources covering data from rehabilitation centers in Kyiv from 2021 to 2023. The study included 120 patients (60 males, 60 females) with stage 2–3 coxarthrosis. The assessment of functional status included gait analysis, range of motion, functional composite movements, pain intensity using the VAS scale, and other indicators. Results. The effectiveness of traditional physical therapy programs in the treatment of stage 2–3 coxarthrosis using evidence-based medicine approaches is analyzed. Traditional physical therapy programs used for treating stage 2–3 coxarthrosis are discussed. The article examines evidence-based medicine approaches to research quality assessment, including randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Overall, this article provides an important overview of the effectiveness of traditional physical therapy programs for treating stage 2–3 coxarthrosis based on evidence-based data. The research demonstrates the overall benefits of the Neuhrach and Mulligan techniques, as well as their combination, for physical therapy in patients with stage 2–3 coxarthrosis. The application of evidence-based medicine approaches allowed for an objective assessment of the quality and potential limitations of rehabilitation programs. Conclusions. The article highlights the advantages and limitations of different traditional physical therapy programs for treating stage 2–3 coxarthrosis based on evidence-based data and emphasizes the relevance of applying the Neuhrach and Mulligan techniques, as well as their combination. The research results underline the necessity of considering individual patient needs and consulting medical professionals when selecting a methodology. This overview contributes to a more informed application of traditional physical therapy programs in the practice of treating stage 2–3 coxarthrosis.

References

Афанасьєв С., Афанасьєва О., Рокутов С., Проскура В., Муквич В. Ефективність застосування відновлювальної технології з використанням інерційної гімнастики та елементів ерготерапії у чоловіків, хворих на коксартроз. Україна. Здоров’я нації. 2021. № 1(63), C. 94–99.

Костючок І.В., Лучишин Н.Ю. Сестринські технології на етапі стаціонарного лікування хворих, які потребують ендопротезування кульшового суглоба. Медсестринство. 2019. № 1. С. 40–43.

Лотогуз С.І., Литвиненко Г.Л., Литвиненко М.І., Карабут Л.В., Рябова О.А. Фізична терапія пацієнтів з коксартрозу. 2022. № 91(2), С. 24–32. https://doi.org/10.35339/ekm.2022.91.2.lll

Матюшенко Д.О., Хаймик Н.В., Мозоль А.О., Ковтун А.В. Патології суглобів з точки зору реабілітаційної медицини: проблеми та перспективи. Молодий вчений. 2017. № 4(44), C. 208–211.

Мороз Н.В., Зарудна О.І. Коксартроз: варіанти лікування на різних стадіях хвороби. Медсестринство. 2015. № 2. С. 47–49.

Неведомська Є.О., Писарев О.О. Фізична реабілітація при артрозі тазостегнового суглоба. Молодий вчений. 2018. № 10(62), C. 477–481. https://www.molodyivchenyi.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/3812/3665

Рой І.В., Луцишин В.Г., Майко О.В., та ін. Вивчення ефективності реабілітаційних заходів у хворих після артроскопічного лікування з приводу початкових стадій коксартрозу. Клінічна анатомія та оперативна хірургія. 2018. С. 6–11.

Тугаров Д.Р., Криницька І.Я. Ендопротезування кульшового суглоба: сучасний стан. Медсестринство. 2016. № 1. С. 16–18.

Шищук В.Д., Щербак Б.І., Шищук А.В. Теорія і практика реабілітації хворих з ураженнями м'яких тканин і суглобів нижньої кінцівки на етапі консервативного лікування: навчальний посібник. Суми: ТОВ «ВПП «Фабрика друку». 2014, c. 96. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/

bitstream-download/123456789/43463/1/Shyschuk_reabilitasia.pdf

Шуба В. Й. Остеоартроз: рання діагностика та лікування. Український медичний часопис. 2016. (1), C. 59–65. https://www.umj.com.ua/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/3089.pdf

Akca N.K., Aydin G., Gumus K. Effect of body mechanics brief education in the clinical setting on pain patients with lumbar dischernia: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017. № 10. Р. 1498–1506.

Albornoz-Cabello M., Maya-Martín J., Domínguez-Maldonado G., Espejo-Antúnez L., Heredia-Rizo A.M. Effect of interferential current therapy on pain perception and disability level in subjects with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2017. № 31. Р. 242–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516639653.

Alhakami A.M., Davis S., Qasheesh M., Shaphe A., Chahal A. Effects of McKenzie and stabilization exercises in reducing pain intensity and functional disability in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2019. № 31. Р. 590–597. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1589/jpts.31.590.

Areeudomwong P., Buttagat V. Comparison of core stabilization exercise and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training on pain-related and neuromuscular response outcomes for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Malays J Med Sci. 2019. № 26. Р. 77–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.6.8.

Areeudomwong P., Buttagat V. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training improves pain-related and balance outcomes in working-age patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019. № 23. Р. 428–436. DOI: https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.005.

Arnold M.C.A., Zhao S., Doyle R.J., Jeffers J.R.T., Boughton O.R. Power-Tool Use in Orthopedic Surgery: Iatrogenic Injury, Its Detection, and Technological Advances: A Systematic Review. JB JS Open Access. 2021. № 6. e21.00013. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00013. PMID: 34841185.

Arnold M.C.A., Zhao S., Doyle R.J., Jeffers J.R.T., Boughton O.R. Power-Tool Use in Orthopedic Surgery: Iatrogenic Injury, Its Detection, and Technological Advances: A Systematic Review. JB JS Open Access. 2021. № 4. e21.00013. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00013. PMID: 34841185.

Balik M.S., Hocaoğlu Ç., Erkut A., Güvercin Y., et al. Evaluation of the quality of life and psychiatric symptoms of patients with primary coxarthrosis after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017. № 84 (6). Р. 436–440.

Bohaček I., Plečko M., Duvančić T., Smoljanović T., et al. Current knowledge on the genetic background of developmental dysplasia of the hip and the histomorphology status of the cartilage. Croatian Medical Journal. 2020. № 61 (3). Р. 260–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2020.61.260.

Dogaru G. The importance of the elemental functional mobility coefficient in assessing the functional status of the coxofemoral joint. Balneo Research Journal. 2018. № 9 (1). Р. 38–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12680/balneo.2018.169.

Gkiatas I., Boptsi A., Tserga D., Gelalis I., et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic literature review of the genes related

with its occurrence. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019. № 4 (10). Р. 595–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190006.

Grifka J., Keshmiri A., Maderbacher G., et al. Klinische Untersuchung des Hüftgelenkes des Erwachsenen. Orthopäde. 2014. № 43. Р. 1115–1132.

Guo C.Y., Liang B.W., Sha M., Kang L.Q., et al. Cementless arthroplasty with a distal femoral shortening for the treatment of Crowe type

IV developmental hip dysplasia. Indian Journal of Orthopedics. 2015. № 49 (4). Р. 442–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159652.

Harsanyi S., Zamborsky R., Krajciova L., Kokavec M., et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a review of etiopathogenesis, risk factors, and genetic aspects. Medicina. 2020. № 56 (4). Р. 153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56040153.

Kraydjikova L., Nikolovska L., Krstev T., Stratorska T. Physiotherapy program for improving the quality of life in patients with coxarthroses.

Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research. 2015. № 8 (1). Р. 69–70.

Laasik R., Lankinen P., Kivimaki M., Aalto V., Saltychev M., Makela K., et al. Return to work after primary total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Orthopaedical. 2019. № 90 (3). Р. 209–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1591081.

Madara K.C., Marmon A., Aljehani M., Hunter-Giordano A., Zeni J., Jr., Raisis L. Progressive Rehabilitation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot and Feasibility Study. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2019. № 14 (4). Р. 564–581.

Malik I.V., Devasenapathy N., Kumar A., et al. Estimation of expenditure and challenges related to rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Orthopedics. 2021. № 55 (5). Р. 1317–1325. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00405-6.

Savchenko V., Maykova T., Afanasiev S., Kashuba V., et al. Disorders of the mineral exchange and metabolism of bone tissue as a pathogenetic basis of physical rehabilitation patients with coxarthrosis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020. № 20 (1). Р. 447–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s1065.

Shah K., Yang X., Lane J.C.E., Collins G.S., Arden N.K., Furniss D., Filbay S.R. Risk factors for the progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Rheumatology International. 2020. № 40 (11). Р. 1781–1792. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04687-1. Erratum in:

Rheumatol Int. 2021. № 41 (7). 1363-4. PMID: 32839851.

Shaw B.A., Segal L.S. Evaluation and Referral for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infants. Pediatrics. 2016. № 138 (6). Р. 4–14. e20163107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3107.

Świtoń A., Wodka-Natkaniec E., Niedźwiedzki Ł., Gaździk T., et al. Activity and Quality of Life after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja. 2017. № 19 (5). Р. 441–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.5823.

Vaquero-Picado A., González-Morán G., Garay E.G., Moraleda L. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: update of management. EFORT open reviews. 2019. № 4 (9). Р. 548–556. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180019.

Zacharias A., Green R.A., Semciw A.I., et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation programs for improving muscle strength in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014. № 22. Р. 1752–1770.

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Hryshyn, I. L., & Antonova-Rafi, Y. V. (2023). COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY OF 2–3 DEGREE COXARTHRSIS AND THE COMBINATION OF THE NEURAC AND MULLIGAN METHODS. Rehabilitation and Recreation, (17), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2023.17.7

Issue

Section

THERAPY AND REHABILITATION

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.